Description:
Who's Your Daddy?
Contents:
Fireproof The Movie - Must See Movie for Fathers and Couples - Stay Out of Family Court [del.icio.us]
The death of the dollar? [del.icio.us]
Fireproof The Movie - Must See Movie for Couples - Stay Out of Family Court
Truly one of the best films we have seen in some time! MUST SEE! Fireproof The Movie is an excellent film about a couple struggling with the possibility of divorce. An inspirational film for all couples to see. Fireproof your marriage and stay out of the hell known as family court. An excellent point on this movie - it does NOT place blame on just men like so many mainstream movies, it truly does review both sides husband and wife. One of the greatest threats to marriages that this movie fails to point out is Title IV-D. However, it makes sense that this was not mentioned because the couple in the story do not have children.Fireproof - The Movie has already made movie history. Only five times before Fireproof came along had a movie been made on a budget of $500,000 and grossed over $30 million! Proof that Hollywood is missing a serious niche that audiences are demanding. EXCELLENT film - See it NOW before it leaves the theaters. Below you can click on various tabs to learn more about the movie Fireproof. Be sure to click on "Watch Trailer" below. If you have seen this movie please comment below and tell our readers what you thought of it.
Tis The Season - Holiday Food Drives
Hello Parents! Just a note to remind all of you-many schools have food drives going on this time of year. Even though times are tough for all of us, please do what you can to help these collection drives be successful. Please remember-families just like yours are having problems putting a proper meal on the table, and many children are not getting enough of the right foods to eat. The family you help out may be one just down the street-dad may have lost his job due to a layoff or a downsize, and mom may be working part-time still, to try to pay some bills..... Being a divorced, non-custodial dad, and still unmarried, I am the sole bread winner for myself and my two daughters. I still managed to get a reasonable bag of canned and non-perishable foods for each of my daughters to add to their class' collection for the schools food drive. Can you help too? A FATHER OF TWO Another way you can help? Educate yourself with the destructive nature of family court systems by reading Taken Into Custody by Dr. Stephen Baskerville, Ph.D. Read this, pass it on and tell at least two people a day about what you learned.
Ron Paul's Campaign for Liberty Gives Thumbs Up for Tim Walberg
Excellent article on Ron Paul's Campaign for Liberty blog. The most devastating loss in Michigan in November was Tim Walberg's loss to Liberal Mark Schauer. Tim Walberg is a true patriot of liberty, as pointed out in Ron Paul's Campaign for Liberty blog, he voted twice against the bailout. The bailout will only mean that taxpayers and their children will become financial slaves to the tax burden created by this bailout. "Michigan's Tim Walberg lost his seat, too, though. Walberg voted against the Great Robbery both times." Glad the Campaign for Liberty recognizes Tim Walberg for being a true patriot and one who fights for his constituents. Special thanks for doing this! As Ron Paul stated there are probably even more bailouts on the horizon which the government will ram down our throats. The greatest loss to Michigan is Tim Walberg. Too bad the National RNC did not have the intelligence to figure this out before the loss. I personally wrote the RNC a total of five times regarding the need for them to step it up a notch on helping Tim Walberg. Number of times they responded - ZERO. The Michigan Republicans and the RNC are trying to figure out what happened this election and the direction they should go. GIVE US MORE CANDIDATES LIKE TIM WALBERG AND ONLY THEN WILL YOU SEE REPUBLICANS GOING TO VOTE. More and more I am seeing virtually no difference between Republicans and Democrats.
Consequences Of "The System" - Family Court
Many people have a system for something-they can have one at work, or at home. It likely helps them accomplish some sort of task. However, bureaucracy also has its systems. Government bureaucracy, and even other bureaucratic types have their systems. Some are merely annoying. Some can be debilitating, some can be dangerous, while others can be devastating. Allow me to offer a comparison of how two "systems" can cause harm. I am a University of Michigan Wolverine football fan. This year, their new coach, Rich Rodriquez, has the Wolverines running what is called a "spread offense", which differs from that the team is used to running, and what the athletes were recruited to run. This year, the Wolverines have a 3-8 record, with one game remaining. The Michigan Wolverines have the best record in the history of NCAA football, but their program is in chaos because of Rodriguez' "system". This season, they have the worst record in their history, and their record streak of 32 straight years with a bowl game birth has been snapped. He could, and should have been coaching a "traditional" offense, so the athletes could have been successful. Not this coach. It was his "system" or nothing-the record does not matter to him. His athletes are demoralized, and play like it. To this type of bureaucrat, the end result means nothing, as long as he is in charge, and everyone is doing things the way he wants, regardless of the consequences. Of course, until this coach is fired, which will likely come soon, I hope!! Michigan's bureaucrats have another "system", the family law court system. What can be more devastating to the state of Michigan than destroying its families and tearing children from their parents? On top of that, Michigan is PAID to do it, by the federal government. The result here-federal incentives under Social Security Title IV-D, totalling BILLIONS of dollars are paid to each state, to forcibly remove a child from the life of one of his or her parents simply because the parents divorce. After all, the bureaucrats only care about the system, and those it benefits. They don't care about the system's victims. All of the bureaucrats responsible for the continuance of Michigan's family law court system cannot be fired. Sure, you can vote many, or even most of them out of office, but their replacements will do the same things, resulting in the same devastation of our families and the lives of our children. Changing the laws, and prohibiting the bureaucrats from continuing this is the only way to stop it. EVERY DAY in Michigan, more children are forcibly removed from one of their parent's lives, and your elected officials only care about the federal dollars that roll in as their reward, and that the system continues to operate as it is..... A FATHER OF TWO Have you joined the Campaign for Liberty?
Let Detroit go Bankrupt! New York Times Mitt Romney [del.icio.us]
Obama Fund Fatherhood Now
Now that the Democrats are running DC and most of Lansing we needto begin to communicate the need for DHS/CAPTA/VAWA/Title IV legislativechange. Looking at what has been proposed during the election we muststrike quickly to get our reform message in their ears. Obama's message of theneed for fathers and families needs to be directed towards legislativechanges that actually encourage the states to keep families intact and bothparents significantly involved with their children. Here is Obama's site let him know what you think: http://www.change.gov/page/s/yourvision/ There is funding available and a drive by President Elect Obama to influence fatherhood so let's get busy. http://www.opencongress.org/bill/110-s1626/text SEC. 2. FINDINGS. Congress makes the following findings: (1) The most important factor in a child's upbringing is whether thechild is brought up in a loving, healthy, supportive environment. (2) Children who grow up with two parents are, on average, more likelythan their peers in single-parent homes to finish high school and beeconomically self-sufficient. (3) Father-child interaction, like mother-child interaction, has beenshown to promote the positive physical, social, emotional, and mentaldevelopment of children. SEC. 107. STATE ASSESSMENTS OF BARRIERS TO EMPLOYMENT AND FINANCIALSUPPORT OF CHILDREN. (a) State Assessments and Reports- As a condition of the continuedapproval of a State plan under part D of title IV of the Social SecurityAct (42 U.S.C. 651 et seq.), each State with an approved such plan,acting through the appropriate State agencies, shall assess the Statepolicies with respect to the issues described in subsection (b) andsubmit a report to the Secretary of Health and Human Services on theresults of such assessment not later than March 15, 2008. (b) (5) Identification of any other barriers to healthy family formationor sustainable economic opportunity for custodial and noncustodialparents that are created or exacerbated by Federal or State laws,policies, or procedures, including an examination of the rules ofFederal and State means-tested programs, the operation of the Stateworkforce system, the availability of financial education services, andthe availability of domestic violence services and child supportprocedures to help victims of domestic violence stay safe and obtain thechild support they are owed. (c) Grants to States for Commissions on State Law Improvements in theBest Interest of Children and Families- The Secretary of Health andHuman Services shall award grants to States to establish or supportcommissions to review the State assessment conducted in accordance withsubsection (a) and to make recommendations on ways to improve State lawin the best interest of children and families. Make sure that the Obama administration puts the money where their mouths are. "The federal government spends $99.8 billion dollars every year onprograms - such as child support enforcement and anti-poverty efforts -that support father-absent homes" https://www.fatherhood.org/research.asp Darrick Scott-Farnsworth Executive Director A Child's Right www.achildsright.org 2692097144
Taxpayer Alert: Say NO to the U.S. Auto Industry Bailout
Our children have already been financially raped by the banking bailout as they will surely be responsible for paying the taxes on the massive amount of OUR money spent. Our families and children will soon become financial slaves to even more taxes based on an upcoming bailout of the U.S. auto industry. Contact your elected officials now and tell them NO on the auto industry bailout. Showdown Looms Over Auto Bailout Plan Democrats Seek Auto Industry Bailout Ron Paul - This Bailout Won't Be The Last
Digg - Ron Paul Taxpayer Alert: Say NO to the U.S. Auto Bailout [del.icio.us]
126 diggs and counting!
Taxpayer Alert: Say NO to the U.S. Auto Industry Bailout [del.icio.us]
Marc H. Rudov - Thou Shall Not Disappoint Her
An excellent article, by Marc H. Rudov, that I wanted to share with everyone. "Thou Shall Not Disappont Her" is a must read article. One important point to mention is that women seek 70% of ALL marriage dissolutions, motivated in part by the Title IV-D pot waiting on the other side of family court. Have you read The Revolution by Ron Paul?
Ron Paul on the 2008 post-election results for Republicans and Democrats
Ron Paul's analysis on the November 2008 election results. On CNN 11/06/08. PLEASE be sure to visit Ron Paul's Campaign for Liberty and to also educate yourself on The Revolution - super cheap on Amazon.com. CAMPAIGN FOR LIBERTY
Commentary: GOP should ask why U.S. is on the wrong trackdelicious [del.icio.us]
North American Union to Replace the USA? - HUMAN EVENTS [del.icio.us]
Sea Shepherd Conservation Society [del.icio.us]
GOP to Ron Paul: Stay in the Party or Else! [del.icio.us]
OCKHAM’S RAZOR: A HERMENEUTIC OF TRUTH
Aristotle. Socrates. Plato. Twenty-five hundred plus years is no small amount of history as the foundation for today’s discussion. The three men profiled arguably founded, not only Greek Classical Thought, but also paved the way for thinking in cultures and peoples stretching beyond Europe, Africa and Asia to also Australia, North and South Americas; from as early as 500 BC to the current twenty-first century AD. That forms of thinking- “knowing of what?”- have segregated into various schools of logic remain today is a testament to the brilliance of these three individuals. The scientific study of interpretation, relegated to its sovereign- truth, is called hermeneutics. Logic is the path to truth, with its vehicle being hermeneutics. The hermeneutic called Ockham’s Razor is the subject for today’s dissection! Ockham’s Razor has been employed in many contexts with subsequent definitions appropriately affixed. Our working definition will remain as it applies to the law, most especially your case and mine! Our working definition is: "All other things being equal, the simplest solution is the best." Now let’s set our parameters. Dominative Narrative: In law, we often refer to the story as the dominative narrative, which contains as its underpinning the paradigm. This is simply understood in the following example: Sally and Tom get a divorce. Sally and Tom have three children. Sally and Tom decide upon day care arrangements at XYZ Daycare for their children. XYZ Daycare charges $100/ week per child. Sally and Tom split the costs, despite Sally having greater use, as a result of her being the custodial parent and her having greater parenting time with said children. Subsequently, after five years, both Sally and Tom become re-married, with each having an additional child. Ironically, both newborns are born only months apart. Additionally, as a result of much court battling, Tom is able to achieve a virtual 50/50 split in the parenting time of the jointly shared children. Both families continue to function, utilizing XYZ Daycare, as both new moms prepare to re-enter the work force. Soon thereafter, Sally’s new husband takes a job promotion and this necessitates Sally and her new hubby to move. The move creates a great distance, too prohibitive for Sally to continue to use XYZ Daycare. As such, she decides, with a newborn now a variable in her considerations, to hire a household employee at $500/ week flat rate to care for both joint children and her newborn. After moving, she informs Tom that she no longer will use the monies, she collects from Tom, to pay XYZ Daycare. Rather, she will utilize said monies to pay the new household employee at her home and that Tom will necessarily need to contribute more to Sally for the additional costs, now $500/ week. This now leaves Tom paying in full any costs that he has at XYZ Daycare when he has the joint children. Sally does not even consider that Tom, himself, has a newborn to plan into his equation. Sally’s dominative narrative echoes her needs as custodial parent. Her paradigm is that of a victim- custodial mother with children at the mercy of a presumptive deadbeat dad who does not want to care for his children’s expenses. Tom, who is financially broke, without council for assistance, turns to his local parental rights group for advice and proceeds to Court in Pro Se, armed with Ockham’s Razor, to defeat this injustice. Tom waits for his turn to speak, before the judge, and states the following: “Sally has proffered a false paradigm of herself as a victim, in order to leverage this Court into granting an unfair award for day care expenses. The true paradigm is rather that Sally has herself chosen not in the best interest of our children and she is unwilling to provide her fair share for our children’s care while victimizing both their father and our children. Here are the facts judge! The New Narrative: “Sally moved without my knowledge until after the move was completed, so that her new husband could increase his income. Sally’s move re-located our children many miles away from their actively involved father who virtually has a 50/50 parenting time split with their mother. Sally then chose, not a day care equal to what has always been an acceptable day care for our children, but rather, she chose an improved style of care- nanny, with nanny’s subsequent cost increase, which serves not necessarily the best interest of our children, but rather serves Sally and her new hubby’s best interest. Even more so, Sally has wrongly included the cost for her newborn into the equation, while eliminating my costs still accruing for our children when they are with me; she has not considered the inherent increase of my travelling costs due to her moving; and, she has not added the known costs for day care associated with my newborn, if we are to compare both sides equally. “Sally’s paradigm is false because according to Ockham’s Razor, ‘the answer that explains all of the facts in the simplest terms is the truth!’ Sally has censored many of the facts. Along with, she has insisted the facts she wants the Court to consider should be interpreted through her supplied paradigm as a victim of me, and as a mother with custody. The truth is found in all the facts explained by the simplest statement. Sally has chosen not in the best interest of our children and she has chosen to increase costs for the care of our children in order to extract greater amounts of money from me. “This is shown by: She has chosen to distance our children from their father and she has increased, unnecessarily, the cost of our children’s day care through moving by creating the need for two day care arrangements and through hiring a nanny, a more expensive form of day care. On top of that, Sally has found that the additional costs associated with her newborn, that I am not the father of, should be shared by me, while the costs associated with my new born should not be equally shared by her. This, while she completely ignores the remaining costs associated with our children’s day care when they are with me and the increased cost of travelling expenses incurred by me due to Sally’s moving for her husband’s job promotion. The New Paradigm: Therefore your Honor, the new paradigm, according to Ockham’s Razor is that Sally operates according to her own self-interest which is towards the increase of her financial status at both the financial and emotional expenses of our children and of their father. I ask that the Court input day care costs at the fixed rate of XYZ Daycare. That Sally and I share these costs now almost twice as much as they used to be. That, neither her newborn, nor my newborn, should be considered in the computation of costs. That Sally re-imburse me half of the costs associated with my additional travels for her moving. And, Orally, I Motion this Court to find a change in circumstances under the MI Custody Act (MCL 722.21 Et, seq.) and Order a hearing in order to determine the Best Interest of our Children! - William of Ockman Big Daddy
A call for change: Elect John McCain [del.icio.us]
Fireproof (The Movie) [del.icio.us]
Mark Schauer Supports Killing Babies by Partial-Birth Abortion. [del.icio.us]
Viewer Discretion is advised due to photo.
No description available. [del.icio.us]
Barbara Kay: Dallas Transit throws all men under the bus in male-bashing ad campaign [del.icio.us]
Voting for True Family Friendly Change
You owe it to research all of the candidates' positions and their past and then decide based on that who you are for rather then who you are against. I pray that you look to your family first then your local community for answers to problems within your life since looking to the government to be your saver through tax payer supported programs has hurt our families and even society. Stop voting for your pocket book, for your security and start voting for your rights, your liberty. Again I must stress that you stop voting for the lesser of two evils and start voting for every politician that you believe is for liberty. If you are concerned about your liberties be sure to visit Ron Paul's Campaign for Liberty. Be sure to sign up for their free newsletter. Also, be sure to educate yourself on government intrustion into our families and share this knowledge with others. We recommend Ron Paul's The Revolution: A Manifesto dsf
DaddyBlogger.com Today We Received Wonderful News
Today our family received wonderful news pertaining to an issue that was quite stressful. Tell the truth and place your life in God's hands. Sometimes you do get everything you want including an amazing wife!
Home
|
